PDA

View Full Version : Dutch seek ban on burqas in public


Adam_Schwartz
November 17, 2006, @ 05:43 PM
This is a pretty sticky situation. I try to look at it from the standpoint that if someone wore a mask around all the time, they would not be forced to remove the mask but would also not be able to integrate into society, i.e. not being able to find work, being alienated by others, etc. But I suppose that is their prerogative. But burqas are not merely a mask, they are part of someone's culture and religious beliefs.

Dutch seek ban on burqas in public

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) -- The Dutch government, facing re-election next week, said Friday it plans to draw up legislation "as soon as possible" banning the head-to-toe garment known as burqas and other clothing that covers the entire face in public places.

The announcement puts the Netherlands, once considered one of Europe's most welcoming nations for immigrants and asylum seekers, at the forefront of a general European hardening of attitudes toward Muslim minorities.

"The Cabinet finds it undesirable that face-covering clothing -- including the burqa -- is worn in public places for reasons of public order, security and protection of citizens," Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk said in a statement.

"From a security standpoint, people should always be recognizable and from the standpoint of integration, we think people should be able to communicate with one another," Verdonk told national broadcaster NOS.

Basing the order on security concerns apparently was intended to respond to warnings that outlawing clothing like the burqa, worn by some Muslim women, could violate the constitutional guarantee against religious discrimination.

The main Dutch Muslim organization CMO has been critical of any possible ban. The idea was "an overreaction to a very marginal problem" because hardly any Dutch women wear burqas anyway, said Ayhan Tonca of the CMO. "It's just ridiculous."

"This is a big law for a small problem," he said. Tonca estimated that as few as 30 women in the Netherlands wear a burqa and said the proposed law could be unconstitutional if it is interpreted as targeting Muslims.

He also said that the security argument did not stand up.

"I do not think people who have bad things in their minds would wear a burqa," he said.

In the past, a majority of the Dutch parliament has said it would approve a ban on burqas, but opinion polls in advance of national elections on November 22 suggest a shift away from that position, and it is unclear if a majority in the new parliament would still back the government-proposed ban.

Amsterdam's mayor, Job Cohen, of the opposition Labor party, said he would like to see burqas disappear, though he did not advocate a ban.

"From a viewpoint of integration and communication, naturally it's very bad," he told reporters. "You can't speak with each other if you can't see each other, so in that sense, I'd say myself the less (it's worn), the better."

The issue has resonance throughout Europe, Former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw recently caused a stir by saying he wants Muslim women to abandon the full-face veil -- a view endorsed by Prime Minister Tony Blair. In France, the center-right's leading presidential candidate Nicolas Sarkozy has increasingly been adopting some of the rhetoric of the extreme-right.

Germany, which also has a large Muslim immigrant community, has a law banning teachers in public schools from wearing head scarves, but no burqa ban.

In Holland, policies associated with the nationalist fringe in 2002 have been co-opted by the center: holding asylum-seekers in detention centers, more muscle for the police and intelligence services, and visa examinations that require would-be immigrants to watch videos of homosexuals kissing and of topless women on the beach. (WTF?) Everyone must learn to speak Dutch, and Muslim clerics must mind what they say in their Friday sermons for fear of deportation.

The Netherlands is deeply divided over moves by the government to stem the tide of new arrivals and compel immigrants to assimilate into Dutch society. The issue was given added urgency with the 2004 slaying of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh by a Muslim fanatic and the failed attempt to expel a Somali-born critic of Islam.

Around 1 million Muslims live in the Netherlands, about 6 percent of the population of 16 million.

After France banned the wearing of head scarves in public schools, the Dutch government decided to leave that question up to individual schools. Most allow head scarves.

The city of Utrecht has cut some welfare benefits to unemployed women who insist on wearing burqas to job interviews. The city claimed the women were using the burqa to avoid working, since they knew they would not be hired.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/17/dutch.burkas.ap/index.html

jinny
November 17, 2006, @ 07:03 PM
hmm...

doesn't sound like a good idea.

have they considered forcing jews to keep their foreskin?

Adam_Schwartz
November 17, 2006, @ 10:48 PM
I somewhat understand where the Dutch are coming from, but it might not be a wise idea. One thing that is an issue in some European nations is that women wearing burqas sometimes refuse to remove them when facial ID is needed, such as at airports.

At the end of the day, if someone wants to cover their face and not assimilate into the host nation's culture, then that is their choice. But they also should not cry foul when they are alienated and shunned by many of the natives. In other words, there are consequences (good and bad) that go along with any choice.

jinny
November 18, 2006, @ 03:13 AM
true.

Killer
November 18, 2006, @ 08:48 AM
I think it's a great idea.

jinny
November 18, 2006, @ 11:52 AM
no one cares what you think! :P

Killer
November 18, 2006, @ 03:52 PM
no one cares what you think! :P

Go fuck yourself you kimchee eating cocksucker.:mhihi: I dont recall a line of people to see what you think either. :lol:

jinny
November 18, 2006, @ 11:39 PM
Go fuck yourself you kimchee eating cocksucker.:mhihi: I dont recall a line of people to see what you think either. :lol:
true...

and fucking myself has already been done today, thank you.

Killer
November 19, 2006, @ 09:36 AM
:lol:

Pull_T
November 20, 2006, @ 01:05 PM
Heh....an early salvo fired by the Dutch with Europe facing dhimmitude in the middle three fifths of this century. The Dutch aren't stupid...they learned their lesson after Gleichschaltung and capitulating to the Germans.

Hopefully they will use their considerable resources to push the Arabs back to the Middle East...and hopefully other Western European countries will do the same before it's too late.

Adam_Schwartz
November 20, 2006, @ 02:58 PM
Heh....an early salvo fired by the Dutch with Europe facing dhimmitude in the middle three fifths of this century. The Dutch aren't stupid...they learned their lesson after Gleichschaltung and capitulating to the Germans.

Hopefully they will use their considerable resources to push the Arabs back to the Middle East...and hopefully other Western European countries will do the same before it's too late.

I applaud you for recognizing that the Dutch, as well as most of Western Europe, are facing severe dhimmitude. It's something most people are ignorant about.

The lack of assimilation by Muslims is becoming a serious problem in several European nations (Germany, UK, Netherlands especially) and is only getting worse. In fact, there are groups of Muslims that want their own Islamist sub-nations within these European countries so they can practice sharia law, which is clearly a bad thing. I am not sure outright banning of burqas is the right first step, but I certainly understand WHY it is being pursued.

For anyone who wants to read more about this, www.dhimmiwatch.com is a very good site (as well as its sister site www.jihadwatch.com). They are both blogs run by Robert Spencer that are very good.

Adam_Schwartz
November 20, 2006, @ 03:30 PM
I thought this would be a good place for this story - there is a video at the website that shows the assignment in question. What a crock of shit.

Controversial Assignment Leads To Teacher's Resignation
POSTED: 4:43 pm EST November 17, 2006
UPDATED: 7:58 pm EST November 17, 2006

SMITHFIELD, N.C. -- A Spanish teacher at Smithfield-Selma Senior High School resigned this week after handing out an assignment that some students and parents said teaches hate.

Khalid Chahhou, who was in his first year of teaching in Johnston County, gave students a worksheet in which they were to translate words and find them within a word-search puzzle.

Some students started uncovering strange words in the process.

"There were words like 'kill,' then I saw it said 'destroy America,'" Eric Herrera said.

As they read on, students found the puzzle contained a paragraph that contained the following phrases:

"Sharon killed a lot of innocent people," a possible reference to former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

"Palestine is not a terrorist group."

"Allah help destroy this body of evil making humanity miserable."

"It was kind of scary at first to think about, you know, your own teacher in your own school that is teaching you," Herrera said.

School administrators said they confronted Chahhou about an unidentified concern Wednesday and he resigned.

"The situation surrounding the resignation has prompted us to call the proper authorities," said Crystal Roberts, the spokeswoman for Johnston County Schools.

The Johnston County Sheriff's Office reviewed the complaint, but investigators said they don't see any reason to file criminal charges or contact other agencies.

Chahhou, who also teaches Arabic at a religious school affiliated with the Islamic Association of Cary, told WRAL in a telephone interview that students got the wrong message from the assignment.

"When I made the assignment, I was upset and angry about a story I recently saw on the news. If any message appears, it is more of a message to myself, not to my students. I never meant to hurt or upset any students or parents," he said.

http://www.wral.com/news/10347144/detail.html

Pull_T
November 20, 2006, @ 03:39 PM
I applaud you for recognizing that the Dutch, as well as most of Western Europe, are facing severe dhimmitude. It's something most people are ignorant about.

The lack of assimilation by Muslims is becoming a serious problem in several European nations (Germany, UK, Netherlands especially) and is only getting worse. In fact, there are groups of Muslims that want their own Islamist sub-nations within these European countries so they can practice sharia law, which is clearly a bad thing. I am not sure outright banning of burqas is the right first step, but I certainly understand WHY it is being pursued.

For anyone who wants to read more about this, www.dhimmiwatch.com is a very good site (as well as its sister site www.jihadwatch.com). They are both blogs run by Robert Spencer that are very good.

Heh...I may be a dyed in the wool liberal, but I'm not a retard. I dislike Muslims, their dogma and the threat of Eurabia as much as the typical "We should just nuke all dem Iracky camel jockeys and turn it into a parking lot" types...heck, prolly moreso since I am not blinded into only seeing the terrorism/war angle of this. The legal immigration, demographic warfare...the dhimmitude is a serious problem.

Like you alluded to, it's the lack of assimilation that is troubling the most and when they do make independent state demands, it'll be serious....not just some retard Flemmish and Catalonian quacks making empty demands. I guess we can hope that the population projection/fertility rate estimates are wrong and that the Arabs will lower their rate after immigration. On the bright side, the Indian Subcontinent seems to be able to repel the Muslim threat through force of their own genitals.

This is a far bigger problem for the World than the Hispanicization of the United States. Heck...I wouldn't mind living in a more Mexican US as much as I would mind seeing Sharia in Europe.

Adam_Schwartz
November 20, 2006, @ 04:15 PM
Heh...I may be a dyed in the wool liberal, but I'm not a retard. I dislike Muslims, their dogma and the threat of Eurabia as much as the typical "We should just nuke all dem Iracky camel jockeys and turn it into a parking lot" types...heck, prolly moreso since I am not blinded into only seeing the terrorism/war angle of this. The legal immigration, demographic warfare...the dhimmitude is a serious problem.

Like you alluded to, it's the lack of assimilation that is troubling the most and when they do make independent state demands, it'll be serious....not just some retard Flemmish and Catalonian quacks making empty demands. I guess we can hope that the population projection/fertility rate estimates are wrong and that the Arabs will lower their rate after immigration. On the bright side, the Indian Subcontinent seems to be able to repel the Muslim threat through force of their own genitals.

This is a far bigger problem for the World than the Hispanicization of the United States. Heck...I wouldn't mind living in a more Mexican US as much as I would mind seeing Sharia in Europe.

Very interesting, your point of view is very refreshing. I think most folks are unaware of the spread of Muslims across Europe, but in a very dangerous way. Even fewer people are unaware of the impact that such changes in Europe will have on the US. And the most recent birth rates I have seen for major European nations is very troublesome - I also hope they are not correct. But to see Italy with a birthrate of 1.2-1.3 kids/family, for instance, is bad.

Your last statement is also interesting - I suppose if we had ONLY two choices (Hispanicization or Islamification), then I would have to pick the former. But I am sure we'd be called "racists" and "insensitive" by most people.

Pull_T
November 20, 2006, @ 04:29 PM
I guess my deal with the "choice" is that in Europe it would be an Islamitization...where as in the US, we would (will?) simply blend our cultures together more and more and it will be more peaceful, gradual and in the end, more pallateable than a Eurabia will be.